Question about non-interference and if it is ever correct to intervene

I will next address your question about non-interference and if it is ever correct to intervene.

Ellen: Good;  thank you.

I will begin by saying, that as a general principle, non-interference is preferred. However, there are times and places where beneficial intervention can occur – when done with the correct intent.

For example, to intervene when a crime is about to occur, is usually appropriate – especially when the crime may harm the innocent and vulnerable.

Intervention is also appropriate in the case of your large polluters – businesses and governments who care more for money than for this planet. Your words and actions to avert these tragedies is certainly called for. 

In the story example that I gave the other night, [about picking water lilies] my intent was that changes, even small changes, made to your natural surroundings can have unintended consequences. Therefore, much consideration needs to be given when making “adjustments” to your natural environment. The plants, animals, and ecosystem are often quite fragile, and even small changes may have unintended consequences. These need to be carefully considered before moving forward with any large-scale projects.

Ellen: Or even smaller-scale projects.

Yes, there also.

Ellen: Anything else here?

I believe I will close on this subject, Ellen.

Ellen: Thank you Yeshua.

You are very welcome.